BACKGROUND to Project 30000 - in exploring new acquaintances with people involved in hosting eith a very deep recociliation network for a humanity or a very hi-trust global one, I tend to explain the background of Project 30000 and then ask some questions. This is a live example (summer 2006) now that I have become very excited about the practice networks of
Leaders Quests
______________
MAPPING MICRO * INTER * MACRO
In humanly valuable local projects we can discover how to inter-connect knowhow to other communities in urgent need, and what Macro crises of globalisation need systemic reconciliation to change the world.
1984 DEATH OF DISTANCE FUTURE HISTORY
Back in 1984 our economics, community networks, science and entrepreneurial editors wrote the first future history on global and local “death of distance”. This book time-lined how to track exponential consequences which compound around worldwide networks as the greatest communications revolution ever. In anticipating unprecedented responsibilities of the first global generation 1984-2024, we anticipated 2005-2015 would be sustainability’s most critical decade. However we are far behind the sustainability minimums we had anticipated, and the exponential downturns of specific faults in globalisation cannot now be over-communicated. Examples include:
Transparent worldwide availability of a Map of 30000 inter-local projects of greatest local development value
Clarification of crisis territories debated across broadcast scale media like the BBC - eg global warming; critical response networks to potential or actual disasters; ending poverty/terror systemised by global economics; reducing national expenditures on arms, ending corrupt systems and cross-cultural strife; new education and mentoring networks for children integrating advantages of collaboration (abundance), not just conditioning competition behaviours (scarcity)
INTERPERSONAL MISSION
I try to understand who (people, networks, new economic investment modes) will collaboratively connect together maps of sustainability’s most vital projects
http://project30000.blogspot.com For 14 years now I have given a lot of my marginal time to this both on the internet and attending open space meetings in many countries.
SAMPLE OF QUESTIONS
____________
Is the mapmaking mission of people around me sufficiently relevant to you that we can work out what information to share over the crisis decade up to 2015?
Which projects have you come across that rank the most highly on all 3 dimensions : local need, interlocal transfer, need to intervene on macro policy of globalisation? Do you have particular foci – eg China as a region?, what as a human need priority?
What sorts of leads can I introduce you to? For example Bill Drayton (the lead protagonist of Bornstein’s Change the World bets-seller) has been linking Micro, Inter, Macro entrepreneurs since 1978, and in the USA is probably the most practically connected person to worldwide sustainability projects. These include 1500 entrepreneurs who each own a local project; web jams by themes such as health for all projects see
www.changemakers.net; 6 people’s macro revolutions now on DVDs including Yunus (Grameen Microfinance), Eigen (Transparency International), Oded Grajew ( Social Forums converging on greater economic responsibility, and corporate benchmarking clusters)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3321985461393888643Part of what I map sees the emergence of a triangle of recurring gamepieces:
Hubs are a physical location which is there for people of every culture to come and nominate project needs, form team experiments
Jams are worldwide webs that theme a project for all competition
Experiential Open Spaces and Quests etc are all the other bridges needed until people who have budget (particularly West Coast Billionaires) believe in putting human knowledge and service ahead of technology alone by openly connecting with local hubs and worldwide jams
--does this make common sense?
I am trying to survey opinion leaders and so interconnect all “inconvenient truth” issues that may cause irreversible harm to sustainability if we do not reconcile them by 2015. For example, Al Gore is training 1000 people later this summer to present his inconvenient truth slides. How do we all make sure we know some whose collaboration network will be there?
How can we get broadcast media interested in all leadership challenges for sustainability of humanity? In particular, in Britain how can we free up the governors of the BBC and reform The Economist to be in line with its 1840s founder’s societal vision? How do we change which alumni networks and mentors teachers connect children with? Survey at
http://er100.blogspot.comWhich networks do you partner with on longest issues and which are you looking for? How can “we extend the conversation” from any mutual questions we have of each other to hosts of (say) major humanitarian networks in London, Washington DC or other capital regions we have everyday presence in? A London-based example I am still trying to evaluate is Tomorrows Global Company (TGC). Originating out of the Royal Society of Arts -if it leveraged all its relationship permissions it could invite different global industry sectors to last call benchmarking groups for sustainability and reversing greatest global risks that each sector is most deeply connected with. TGC’s 2 main events of the last 12 months were Gore’s Inconvenient Truth & Annan’s Global Compact – both of whom have agendas for sustainability with deadlines 2015. Translating this back to global market power: for example, if we most of us can see we are running out of clean water, which industry sectors need to be got to the collaboration table so that water wars do not compound the way oil wars have, and how do we issue such meta-network invitations?
Do any of the above questions come first, or do they all criss-cross through each other? How do we minimise re-invention of the wheel of who’s experimenting with globally changing what and how? Quest sounds like a format that could be network-certified at all sorts of levels and arenas of leadership – how tightly or loosely do you want to see leadership quests become popular among ethical people all over the world?